Video Tag
Every video tagged “franchise review” in the library — a focused slice of the Halloween archive.
5 videos
In a St. Patrick's Day-themed episode, the Haunt Former channel reviews Leprechaun 4: In Space (1996), the fourth entry in the long-running horror-comedy franchise. The review offers the host's take on this campy sci-fi installment, which transplants the murderous leprechaun into an outer-space setting. It sits outside the channel's typical Halloween prop and haunt content, functioning as a seasonal horror film commentary piece.
A ranked retrospective of the entire Child's Play film franchise, tracing the series from its 1988 origins through its evolution as a horror-comedy blend centered on the murderous doll Chucky. The host shares personal opinions on each entry and invites viewers to weigh in with their own rankings. It's a casual, fan-driven discussion rather than a technical or how-to video.
Haunt Former takes a deep dive into the SAW franchise in this podcast-style 'OverReview,' blending an overview of the series with critical commentary. The discussion covers the full span of the SAW canon, exploring its signature traps, gore, and moral dilemmas that have kept audiences hooked across multiple films. It's a conversational, Halloween-season-appropriate look at one of horror's most complex and enduring franchises.
Haunt Former delivers a critical review of Leprechaun Origins (2014), arguing the film fails on both counts its title promises — it features neither a recognizable Leprechaun character nor any meaningful origin story. The review leans into rant territory, dissecting how this WWE Studios reboot diverges disappointingly from the beloved cult franchise. It's a punchy, opinionated take aimed at horror fans who grew up with the original Leprechaun series.
This short review from the Haunt Former channel examines The Cloverfield Paradox, the 2018 Netflix installment in the Cloverfield franchise, and weighs it against its predecessors. The host offers a moderately positive take, acknowledging the film may have been underrated or poorly received while arguing it delivers more than expected. At around six minutes, the review is a quick, opinionated overview rather than a deep analytical breakdown.
